By 2050 the South African population is expected to grow by 19 – 24 million people, many of whom will live in cities or towns. Given cities are crucial for global development, their performance in delivering basic services and positive development outcomes is inextricably linked to the wellbeing of their citizens, regions, countries and the world.

 

With so much pressure on cities to perform, it is essential that adequate data and intelligence exists for cities to make better, more informed decisions, prepare better policies and plans and measure and report on results against set goals.

 

Read More

This section of the State of Cities Report provides evidence, analysis and insight into the development performance of and trends in metropolitan municipalities through city data profiles. The profiles cover all of the SACN’s participating cities as well as Cape Town.

 

The data for these profiles was predominantly drawn from the South African Cities Open Data Almanac (SCODA). SCODA is a city-centric online data portal that provides current and comparable information about South African cities, to help inform evidence-based policy, planning, decision-making and reporting. It offers an online central repository platform of open data from reliable sources.

Read More

In order for cities to meet their objectives of becoming more economically and socially inclusive, sustainable and spatially transformed, a whole-of-government and all-of-society approach are required, as South African cities have made little progress in achieving key development outcomes.

 

This chapter, which contains five sections, unpacks how South African cities can achieve their long-term goals by demonstrating how their practices can be improved upon and broadened at both the project and systemic level.

Read More

This section presents nine case studies of city projects that demonstrate how cities have used cooperative governance and all-of-society approaches. They show that local government has had mixed results working with all spheres of government and sectors of society (including civil society and the private sector). Some of the case studies demonstrate how whole-of-government and all-of-society approaches can lead to positive change, while others highlight the barriers within the governance system that hinder their uptake.

Read More

South Africa has a progressive and forward-thinking legislative framework, focused on ‘righting the wrongs’ of apartheid with local government placed at the core of rebuilding communities. Yet, results from the past 25 years have been mixed. Yes, South Africa has institutionalised a system of local government, and many people in its cities are experiencing a better quality of life. However, many municipalities are in a dangerous cycle of decline and have lost credibility with their communities. Despite its founding directive and best intentions, local government has not been able to deliver adequately on its developmental mandate. The reasons are multi-faceted and complex, which makes defining the best and most appropriate solutions to the challenges facing local government very complicated.

 

This final section of the SoCR continues the discussion from Chapter 1, Section 2 and its core intention is to define a reform agenda for local government. It is constituted by three sub-sections.

Close
Close
Close
Close
Close
Close
Close
Close
Close
Governing cities and towns is complex and challenging as it has to respond to globalisation and its many crises: climate change, inequality, political instability, terrorism, migration, social polarisation and pandemics. Yet defendable global development and prosperity are reliant on the sustainability of the world’s cities and this depends on how well cities are governed.

This section takes a closer look at the conceptual, historical, legislative and policy context for the SOCR. Its main take-out is that key governance improvements are needed if South African cities are to meet their development objectives in the way that were envisaged. The Constitution, despite its noble intent, has failed to produce the kind of developmental and rights-based urban autonomy that is required to achieve the ideals espoused by the IUDF, Sustainable Development Goal 11 and the New Urban Agenda.

It also considers how local governments’ funding base needs to be broadened, and resources for strategic projects and community assistance must not be consumed by operating costs.

A pursuit of all-of-society partnerships is essential for cities to make the most of the funding they do have, and this section showcases that urban autonomy is not achieved through delegation, funding and intergovernmental arrangements alone and that there is a need for a new approach to urban governance and a renewed look at urban governance structures.

Achieving the IUDF’s vision will require doing things differently – a sense of urgency and considerable political are needed for a new approach to urban governance.

Read Section Here

Close

Transversal cooperation for inclusion and wellbeing

Inclusivity and wellbeing are critical for cities’ sustainability, as it leads to a better quality of life for city dwellers. Yet not much progress has been made towards enabling inclusivity in our cities through places that all people, including the marginalised, can own. Decades after apartheid, many urban dwellers remain socially, spatially and economically excluded. This has been deepened by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Fortunately there are pockets of excellence where an all-of-society approach and cooperation among government spheres has made their cities more inclusive. They are making cities safer, involve the youth in urban processes, are improving informal settlements’ living conditions while creating better public spaces. Other cities are urged to follow in their footsteps as there is a general lack of progress in making and managing more inclusive spaces. This is in part due to local governance structures that are constrained in terms of devolution, transversal management and intergovernmental relations. Conflict among communities and stakeholders also exist and to change the status quo will require a whole-of-government and all-of-society approach, including the participation among government spheres, public agencies and other sectors of society.

Read Section Here

Close
Transforming the Rules of the Game

Addressing spatial transformation in our cities is among our key needs, yet its success depends on the governance capacity of the municipal institution. Internal municipal environments can hinder or harness equitable spatial outcomes, and the structural forces in municipalities share the behaviours of practitioners which negatively affect spatial transformation goals. These structural forces are both formal (legislative) and informal (institutional norms and power dynamics) and impact intergovernmental cooperation, community partnerships and long-term meaningful engagement.

To attain greater spatial inclusion/ transformation in our cities requires a shift in these structural forces. This includes the measurement and reward of intergovernmental cooperation, the review of legislation and regulations, the improvement of the political-administrative interface, building capacity and learning and integrating social facilitation skills.

Read Section Here

Close
Governance and Economic Inclusion

Inclusive growth in cities is of upmost importance and cities have the ability to address historical economic constraints. But while cities are key drivers of productivity, economic gains are not always evenly distributed and many South Africans are still excluded from participating and benefitting meaningfully. Job opportunities have not always been constant and many cities have experienced “jobless growth”, resulting in poor, disadvantaged citizens being excluded from benefitting in improved GDP. The majority of people remain susceptible to precarious income generation and skills development opportunities, which prevents them from accessing the formal economy and all its benefits.

Furthermore, the shock of Covid-19 exposed the economy’s fragility. To address this, economic actors need to come together to improve a city’s economy and foster economic inclusion. This requires an understanding of the importance of an all-of-society approach. These same actors need to better cooperate to understand city economies through cooperative structures associated with economic development levers. This is crucial to facilitate economic growth, inclusion and redress.

Read Section Here

Close
Cooperative Governance of the Just Urban Transition

Enabling a just urban transition through cooperative governance and an all-of-society approach to tackle issues of sustainability are essential. In order for cities to meet this growing challenge that affects all its residents, but specifically those living on the outskirts of our cities, partnerships are needed that enable knowledge-sharing and cooperation (for energy, water and waste).

While national policy frameworks and city-level strategies are being adopted – which goes some way to demonstrate cities’ commitment to a just urban transition – despite all the efforts made, the practical challenges associated with this shift have not been fully grasped. Stakeholders across sectors of society need to formulate a shared value proposition to achieve great change.

South African cities face a triple challenge: responses to environmental issues, deepening socioeconomic inequalities espoused by the Covid-19 pandemic and a new mode of cooperative government that can navigate the complexities of cities in the information age. Addressing this requires cooperative governance, codes and practices, partnerships and integrated infrastructure plans.

Read Section Here

Close
The Port of East London, which began construction in 1872 and is South Africa’s only river port, represents a major economic node and is a strategic asset to the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality (BCMM). It is a strategic corridor of investment that drives the economy of East London and the region. Unlocking its potential requires collaboration between a wide range of public and private stakeholders who have different views and objectives.

This case study demonstrates what can be achieved when various stakeholders act together in pursuit of a common vision for the development of the port, which has experienced a lack of investment with regards to its capacity, facilities and expansion. This limits the port’s ability to attract new markets or meet existing customer needs, impacting the region’s wider development.

To address these issues requires collaboration between various parties. Besides the BCMM, public stakeholders are Transnet, the National Ports Authority, and other national and subnational state agencies and SOEs. Private stakeholders are represented by local businesses and external investors. Different stakeholders have different views on approaches to the port’s development and Covid-19 and related impacts have added additional pressure on decision-making around investments and budget allocations. This said, three interventions have been taken and include:

–          A visit by Transnet Board to the Port of East London

–          The establishment of the Port Consultative Committee (PCC)

–          An intergovernmental memorandum of understanding and technical task team.

While all stakeholders involved in the Port of East London agreed on its importance, they struggled to align their views and objectives with regards to a shared vision because there were few mechanisms for intergovernmental cooperation. However, by continuing to pursue a cooperative governance approach that places value on good leadership, trust and accountability and a clear identification of the roles and responsibilities of each of the different players involved, the potential exists for the successful development of the port.

Read Section Here

Close

Like so many South African cities, a growing housing backlog was being experienced in the City of Ekurhuleni in 2015 thanks to insufficient, affordable, formal housing options which has resulted in the mushrooming of informal settlements. This scenario led to the launch of the City’s Reblocking Programme. Through a multi-layered approach, it aimed to decongest the installation of basic infrastructures to create a safe, serviceable and habitable environment that reduced health, fire, security and socioeconomic risks.

The Reblocking Programme was borne out of the City’s long-term Growth and Development Strategy 2055 which provides the “provision of liveable spaces where people have dignity”. By 2020, 35 informal settlements located on municipal land had undergone reblocking. The city’s target is to upgrade 15 informal settlements a year.

In practice, reblocking is a four-stage process which involves pre-planning, planning, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Each project has its own scale and complexity and the level of stakeholder participation across the four stages are determined by the individual informal settlements. This means a universal standard approach does not exist. However, through a committee-based governance model – which consists of three core committee types – community participation was galvanised around a shared goal, where the City and communities became partners through co-creation and co-ownership of reblocking.

Post-implementation, the City’s motivation for reblocking evolved from an interim short-term solution to a systemic solution for solving the many challenges associated with urban informality. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic further added impetus for accelerating reblocking, especially de-densification and the delivery of better-quality, more accessible and sanitation services.

Read Section Here

Close

Since 1992 the community of Ebony Park/ Kaalfontein called for their five-room local clinic to be upgraded to a Community HealthCare Centre (CHC) as it was inadequate for their needs. The closest alternative was in Tembisa and was difficult and expensive to access. Yet a CHC fell within the Gauteng provincial government’s mandate and the City of Johannesburg could only build an Ideal Clinic, which just provides primary healthcare services and chronic and acute care. This was rejected by the community. However, due to community pressure, backlash and action, provincial and local government joined forces and signed a service-level agreement to deliver a CHC that included a maternity and obstetrics unit and 24-hour emergency facility.

Provincial government, which has taken over the running of the facility, funded the project and it opened on 20 February 2020. This case study demonstrates the power that communities have in holding the government to account.

Health services and infrastructure responsibilities are shared across provincial and local spheres. The former has access to funding while the latter has access to on-the-ground intelligence and understands what cities need. As such, integration is key. Communities also do not distinguish between government spheres and expect the state to deliver as one.

A key partner in the development process of the CHC was the Johannesburg Development Agency (JDA). As an implementing agent the City could respond to the community’s demands quickly. Working with the JDA increased efficiencies and reduced timelines and costs. Based on learnings from the project, the JDA and The City developed an infrastructure model which enables the City to deliver within a five-year budget cycle, but importantly avoids overlapping mandates and duplication. Further, cognisance that community inclusion is critical to projects such as this – especially pre and during the process – was made.

The initial failure to deliver what the community needed was not due to a lack of communication, rather it was constrained by its limited mandate that did not extend to providing 24-hour services. Local government often bears the brunt of citizens’ dissatisfaction with service delivery and, as such, a better understanding of the barriers that limited mandates pose to local service delivery is needed, as is the importance of intergovernmental collaboration.

Read Section Here

Close

Like so many authorities in South Africa, Msunduzi is struggling to achieve clean audits and deliver on its mandate. It has faced governance challenges since its creation in 2000, when various municipal areas were amalgamated. The challenge of integrating these areas’ internal systems, policies, procedures and resources compounded poor financial controls. The municipality was thus placed under administration in 2010. While it achieved a clean audit in 2014/ 2015, it never recovered from the 2010 crisis. In 2019 it was again placed under administration by the provincial government due to irregular expenditure and a lack of political oversight and leadership.

To overcome these challenges, a new Mayor was elected in 2019 and a new City Manager was appointed in 2020. Despite the challenges that the Covid-19 pandemic threw the municipality’s way, the new leadership was determined to address its issues. Its successful turnaround strategy was based on four key areas:

  • Finance and Governance
  • Service Delivery Model and Performance Management
  • Organisational Reconfiguration and Capacity Building
  • Combating Fraud, Corruption and Misconduct

Alongside this strategy, leadership has taken urgent steps to fill senior management positions and has recognised that an important control measure to address is the lack of consequence management. Although the city has a long way to go, the Council is functioning properly.

Read Section Here

Close

Rampant drug abuse and drug-related treatment admissions in Tshwane was of concern to politicians and city health officials. This led the City to find a practical, accessible, affordable and science-based response. The outcome was the Community Orientated Substance Use Programme (COSUP). Launched in 2015 it is a partnership between the City of Tshwane, the University of Pretoria and local communities. Rolled out successfully in the following years, COSUP’s strength and versatility were highlighted when the Covid-19 pandemic hit, and the programme was extended for another three years.

The initial success of the programme was based on the network governance model, between the three parties (City of Tshwane, University of Pretoria and local communities), and other partners as well as a broad spectrum of actors, where each fulfilled its own role and had clear responsibilities.

While the demand for COSUP services is currently greater than the programme’s capacity, the Tshwane story highlights how the municipality’s ability to initiate, establish and participate in cross-sectoral partnerships and programme implementation has enhanced its ability to deliver these services. Covid-19 has also demonstrated the value of a network governance model that, through engagement between the City and its partners, enabled it to meet the expectations of its citizens. That said, there is still scope for improving the programme’s integration across sectors and with primary healthcare facilities, and for extending its reach to vulnerable substance users in society, such as women.

Read Section Here

Close

Food distribution channels were shut down on 26 March 2020 in response to the Covid-19 hard lockdown thanks to the closure of informal activities and formal businesses. At the same time, the national food relief system was closed, as it was not designed for a crisis the magnitude of Covid-19. This exasperated the Western Cape’s food security crisis and as the demand for food spiked, existing resources closed down. In response, actors across provincial and local government, civil society, individuals and the private sector joined forces to mobilise their resources. This is a story of how an all-of-society approach can affect real and immediate relief to those who need it most.

First on the scene was civil society. Community Action Networks (CANs) sprang up organically, while Cape Town Together (CTT) formed to connect the CANs and individuals in the Cape Town metropole communities. Food relief efforts were further enabled through the Economic Development Partnership (EDP) which engaged with the CANs and Premier of the Western Cape. The Food Relief Forum (FRF) was established thereafter as a government-led mechanism to coordinate resources and mobilise actors. By mid-May the Forum was providing meals and distributing food parcels to those in need, in partnership with the Solidarity Fund.

By July 2020 the FRF saw a decline for emergency food relief as lockdown levels were reduced and prior food relief programmes started operating again. By October 2020, the FRF switched to balancing short-term interventions and long-term strategies in the food system. This led to the establishment of the Western Cape Food Systems Working Group. It explores ways to address food security through evidence-based, coordinated learning and action.

While Covid-19 exposed the structural flaws in South Africa’s food system, the FRF illustrates how a cooperative governance network model works in practice based on an all-of-society approach to collaboration. Central to this is an iterative approach, based on learnings and adaptation. Actors also need to work towards their strengths and organise around a shared vision and common purpose rather than wait for the ‘perfect plan’. Despite itself, the crisis facilitated opportunities for social, organisational and technological innovation.

Read Section Here

Close

Homelessness during the Covid-19 pandemic reached fever pitch during Lockdown Level 5 in March and April 2020 and eThekwini was faced with an unprecedented crisis. At such a crucial time, a multi-stakeholder Task Team was needed to unlock resources and mobilise local partners – especially as the national government was in emergency mode. Against this backdrop, the local government had to come up with rapid decisions and interventions to alleviate the socioeconomic consequences of the lockdowns on a local level.

In response, the municipality established the Joint Operations Centre and Covid-19 War Room, as well as a Multidisciplinary Task Team (MDTT). The City Budget Form was also established to successfully bring together multiple government stakeholders working across different spheres and sectors. Furthermore, the Deputy Mayor activated the existing Task Team on Homelessness to bring together city officials from different municipal departments, as well as NGOs and universities.

Thirteen (13) safe spaces that included ablutions, basic shelter and hygiene packs were identified, and in which mobile clinics were established. The Metro Police were also tasked to manage the sites through its human-rights approach to the homeless. Altogether, the response was so effective that the health and wellbeing of the homeless at the designated sites radically improved.

The pandemic brought to the fore how quickly alliances and cooperation among spheres of government can materialise. One outcome was the City Budget Forum, which successfully brought together multiple government stakeholders, across different sectors, through the National Treasury’s City Support Programme. This forum became a powerful platform for building financial sustainability and addressing the city’s major socioeconomic needs beyond the pandemic, and illustrates how important it is to build on insights from a crisis to sustain their function in a ‘new normal’.

This approach has led to municipalities needing to rethink how they respond to other emergencies (health, environment, resource or unrest) and operate within a ‘new normal’, while collaborating differently with multiple stakeholders on a much more continuous basis. There is an opportunity now to create bold new strategy, policy and operating procedures, that not only respond to crises but also plan for them.

Read Section Here

Close

In 2001, three urban areas (Bloemfontein, Botshabelo and Thaba Nchu) were merged to form Mangaung. The area has long served as an essential regional services function, from its early days as a trading post, to today as a home to education, sporting and healthcare facilities. Yet, like so many South African metros, Mangaung suffers from segregated colonial and apartheid planning. This story unpacks three projects that aim to address the City’s inequalities: the airport node development, the Waaihoek precinct and Naval Hill redevelopment.

The airport node was the first significant development of the N8 Corridor project. It dates to the first Mangaung Integrated Development Plan (IDP) and Free State Provincial Development Plans. The aim of the development is to undo the legacy of apartheid by creating new settlements to the north of the industrial area and economic activty and human settlements in the eastern part of the city. Currently, the project is still in the process of township establishment, a task that is being undertaken and funded by the Housing Development Agency.

The Waaihoek precinct has substantial heritage value, being the first black settlement in Bloemfontein and home to the Wesleyan Church, the birthplace of the ANC in 1912. Its development is to take advantage of heritage to revitalise the southern part of the central business district by improving linkages, providing incentives for private businesses, accommodating informal trading, building a range of subsidised and market-driven housing and unlocking heritage potential.

The redevelopment of Navel Hill aims to create a world-class tourism attraction using the Naval Hill Game Reserve’s natural and cultural value.

The three projects in Mangaung are all designed based on sound rationale i.e. the need for spatial integration and economic development to address the spatial legacy of apartheid planning.

Read Section Here

Close

This story explores the importance of effective planning application processes for small businesses. Yet in Nelson Mandela Bay, delays in processing land development applications was slow which resulted in a backlog of planning applications queries. To address this, the local municipality introduced an Electronic Municipal Application Management System (e-MAMS) which comprised various sub-systems. Its introduction aided existing shortfalls in the City’s land-use application processes, which were exacerbated by Covid-19 as many City departments closed. Given land application systems can affect a city’s attractiveness for investment, business expansion and growth, these delays significantly hampered the City’s business viability and operations.

e-MAMS replaced the traditional paper-based system. It provided a platform that enables the integration of city planning systems and the digitisation of submissions, workflows and decision-making. This reduced the number of incomplete applications and associated delays. It is also a document management system and can be integrated into performance management systems.

Taken together, the system brings benefits to four areas: people, data, processes and systems by making staff more accountable, data available in real time, defining and standardising business processes and enabling a fully integrated system, among others.

Private business and civil society responded positively to this pilot project. Keeping the municipality working during the Covid-19 lockdowns also provided insights into how it could engage with stakeholders more effectively. Specifically, the lockdown demonstrated the benefit of PPPs, collaboration among stakeholders and a shared purpose. Learning from the lockdown’s impact offered ways to overcome it and may offer important opportunities for significant shifts in focus, methods of working and approaches to political instability in the post Covid-19 city.

Read Section Here

Close

The purpose of this section is to provide a broad overview of the history of local government in South Africa and to reflect on the core ideals and principles that inform and define the current system of local government. It provides a framework for understanding local government’s successes and challenges, and for questioning whether the assumptions underlying the current system are still relevant and appropriate.

Read Section Here

Close

Cities are experiencing their greatest turbulence in the democratic era, with shifting dynamics in the formation of councils and ongoing urbanisation challenges, including population pressure, poverty, and the effects of energy and water scarcity. The following recommendations are offered to cities, as a basis for a new political outlook for local government, to enable cities to survive and thrive in the next phase of democratic local government and beyond.

1. Adopt a local model of cooperative governance

Local government should adopt a cooperative model of governance, which draws on the cooperative business models practiced in communities.

2. Implement a differentiated approach to problem-solving

Any long-lasting solution must recognise that municipalities are not identical but face similar problems of varying magnitudes. ‘One-size-fits-all’ and generic solutions will not address the deep-rooted and systemic problems facing cities.

3. Amplify the ‘voice’ of local government

Although the Constitution defines local government as an equal and autonomous sphere in the government system, in practice local government’s authority is vastly diminished. To strengthen the ‘voice’ of local government, municipalities must be involved in in all issues that affect the local environment.

4. Rethink the architecture and design of the local government system

As cities face (and will continue to face) emergencies, strong and resilient administrations need to be developed and insulated. This means separating the legislative and executive functions in municipalities, which will require rethinking the architectural design of the local government system.

5. Implement an all-of-society and whole-of-government approach

What is needed is both a whole-of-government approach and an all-of-society approach, involving the various spheres and entities of government and all parties who have a stake in the local environment in order to support the developmental outcomes of local government. The starting point is for municipalities to build trust with these stakeholders.

 

Read Section Here

Close

There are a number of realities facing local government that hinder its ability to attain its ideals.

These include:

  • The ideal vs the reality of the cooperative governance system
  • The structure of local government and the role of cities
  • The state of municipal leadership, politics, and administration
  • The ideal vs reality of the all-of-society approach
  • The struggle to achieve the financial sustainability of municipalities
  • Challenges with service delivery and infrastructure
  • The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic

Read Section Here

Close